Custom Energy Solutions

With an extensive portfolio of energy solutions to fit your technique and individual patient needs, the INFINITI® Vision System provides unprecedented flexibility in selecting the optimal energy modality for any situation.

Greater phaco efficiency

The unique OZil® Torsional handpiece is the only phaco device that features side-to-side oscillating ultrasonic movement. The result is a wide range of exceptional benefits during phacoemulsification procedures.

Reduces Repulsion

Ultrasonic oscillations cut lens material using a shearing effect.
Eliminates repulsion associated with traditional ultrasound induced by the jackhammer effect
Side-to-side movement increases cutting efficiency by emulsifying lens material with both directions of movement1,2,3,4

Improves Followability

Lack of repulsion facilitates occlusion and effective delivery of energy into nuclear fragments
Decreases time to remove lens material3,4
Improves followability3,5 and decreases dispersion of nuclear fragments during emulsification6
Reduces irrigation fluid consumption5 and increases your surgical efficiency
Less dependence on excessively high fluidics7,8

Improves Thermal Safety Profile

Operates at cooler temperatures than traditional ultrasound9,10,11
Allows the use of sealed incisions and continuous torsional modes12

Small and Lightweight Handpiece

Reduces fatigues using a titanium handpiece weighing only 60 grams
Provides surgeons the choice of ultrasonic oscillations, traditional ultrasound, or a combination of the two

The smarter way to phaco

The dynamically adaptive software of OZil® Intelligent Phaco continuously monitors and responds to ongoing phacoemulsification conditions throughout the procedure for more effective energy delivery.

OZil® IP is an intelligent energy management system that:

Enhances OZil® emulsification by keeping the lens material at the shearing plane, the ideal location for emulsification13
Increases followability3,5
Improves fluidic movement of fragments to and through the tip,5,14 flow not interrupted
Keeps eye in more natural state15,16
Reduces IOP fluctuation - reduces post-occlusion surge

A unique alternative to ultrasound

The innovative AquaLase® Liquefaction Device offers an alternative to ultrasound in soft to medium density cataract lenses while potentially reducing surgical complications.

Fluidic Pulse Technology

Delaminates and separates lens tissue through warmed pulses of irrigating solution
Delivers a "scoop-like" energy pulse of only 4 microliters
Allows lens removal with a "more in the bag" technique
Creates fluidic pulses with no mechanical motion of the tip
Quickly dampens pulse energy density within the fluid of the anterior chamber

Parameters
The INFINITI® Vision System gives you control over AquaLase® device parameters, allowing you to:

Change pulse strength by altering volume and velocity
Vary pulse rate and activate burst
Vary rest intervals for decreased repulsion of nuclear material

Utilizing Prechop Technique
The AquaLase® Liquefaction device allows you to evolve your technique to optimize patient outcome.

Allows you to determine nuclear hardness prior to tip entry
Exposes layers of the lens for increased effectiveness of delamination and minimized fluid pulses
Enables an "in the bag" technique, access to high-vacuums, and minimized anterior chamber turbulence

Designed to meet unique patient needs

The INFINITI® Vision System features customized power modulations that provide an unsurpassed range of energy options for different patient needs.

Pulse and Hyperpulse

Provides access to high pulse rates with customizable on times and variable duty cycles
Allows for reduced repulsion and improved thermal safety profile

Smart Pulse

Allows low energy delivery to complement traditional micropulse phaco settings below 20 ms

Linear Burst

Adds control of energy power to the traditional burst mode for instantaneous control and decreased repulsion
Improves thermal safety by providing modulation of ultrasound energy delivery
Optimizes control of burst delivery, burst energy level and duty cycle, enabling better occlusion.
Intrepid AutoSert IOL Injector - See Specs. Not available for sale in the US.

Important Safety Information - INFINITI Vision System
1. Liu Y, Zeng M, et al. Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification; randomized comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:287–292.
2. Rekas M, et al. Comparison of torsional and longitudinal modes using phacoemulsification parameters. Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1719–1724.
3. Davison J. Cumulative tip travel and implied followability of longitudinal and torsional phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. June 2008;34.
4. Vasavada, AR, et al. (2010). Comparison of torsional and microburst longitudinal phacoemulsification: a prospective, randomized, masked clinical trial. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010;41(1):109-114.
5. Cionni, RJ. Length and frequency of intraoperative occlusive events with new torsional phacoemulsification software. J Cataract Refract Surg. In press.
6. Cionni R. Comparison of nuclear material chatter: longitudinal versus torsional phacoemulsification. Paper presented at: The ASCRS Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery; April 30, 2007; San Diego, CA.
7. Johansson, C. Quantitative comparison of longitudinal versus torsional phacoemulsification. Paper presented at: European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Annual Meeting; September 9-13, 2006, London.
8. Johansson, C. Optimizing vacuum settings in torsional phacoemulsification employing lower vacuum settings with torsional facilitates the use of microincision surgery. Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today. May 2008.
9. Han, YK, et al. Heat production: longitudinal versus torsional phacoemulsification. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2009;35(10):1799-1805.
10. Zacharias, J. Thermal characterization of phaco probes operated in torsional and longitudinal modalities using alternative methodologies. Paper presented at: ASCRS; 2011, San Diego, CA.
11. Jun B. Thermal study of longitudinal and torsional ultrasound phacoemulsification: tracking the temperature of the corneal surface, incision, and handpiece. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2010;36(5):832-837.
12. Jun B. Corneal wound architecture and integrity after torsional and mixed phacoemulsification: evaluation of standard and microincisional coaxial techniques. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010 Jan-Feb;41(1):128-34.
13. Aslan, B. Quantitative evaluation of new energy delivery modality in phacoemulsification: power modulation. Paper presented at: ASCRS; 2010, Boston, MA.
14. Fernández de Castro, LE, et al. Bead-flow pattern: quantitation of fluid movement during torsional and longitudinal phacoemulsification. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2010;36(6):1018-1023.
15. Han, YK. Comparison of vacuum rise time, vacuum limit accuracy, and occlusion break surge of 3 new phacoemulsification systems. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 35(8):1424-1429.
16. Aslan, B. OZil IP in a cataractous/glaucomatous eye. Jul/Aug 2010. Insert to Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today Europe.

Caution: Federal (USA) law restricts this device to sale by, or on the order of, a physician. For Important Safety Information, click here.